Yet another report (do we need more?) on the severe implications of peak oil and failure to address it by the Global Climate Change, Human Security & Democracy (GCCHSD) research group at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
The report is a synthesis of the current state of knowledge on energy resources and global climate and environmental change. The findings clearly indicate that the convergence of peak energy resources and dangerous anthropogenic climate and environmental change will likely have a disastrous impact in the near- and long-term on the quantity and quality of human life on the planet (see synopsis below). Topics include: peak oil, coal, natural gas, uranium, and phosphorus; climate change; environmental degradation; population; food and agriculture; water resources; and the limits of biofuels (including algae-based biofuels).
Some key messages from the report include:
· Peak oil is happening now.
· The era of cheap and abundant oil is over.
· Global conventional oil production likely peaked around 2005 – 2008 or will peak by 2011.
· Global oil reserve discoveries peaked in the 1960′s.
· New oil discoveries have been declining since then, and the new discoveries have been smaller and in harder to access areas (e.g., smaller deepwater reserves).
· Huge investments are required to explore for and develop more reserves, mainly to offset decline at existing fields.
· An additional 64 mbpd of gross capacity – the equivalent of six times that of Saudi Arabia today – needs to be brought on stream between 2007 – 2030 to supply projected business as usual demand.
· Since mid-2004, the global oil production plateau has remained within a 4% fluctuation band, which indicates that new production has only been able to offset the decline in existing production.
· The global oil production rate will likely decline by 4 – 10.5% or more per year.
· Substantial shortfalls in the global oil supply will likely occur sometime between 2010 – 2015.
· Furthermore, the peak global production of coal, natural gas, and uranium resources may occur by 2020 – 2030, if not sooner.
· Global peak coal production will likely occur between 2011 – 2025.
· Global natural gas production will likely peak sometime between 2019 – 2030.
· Global peak uranium will likely occur by 2015 to sometime in the 2020′s.
· Oil shortages will lead to a collapse of the global economy, and the decline of globalized industrial civilization.
· Systemic collapse will evolve as a systemic crisis as the integrated infrastructure and economy of our global civilization breaks down.
· Most governments and societies – especially those that are developed and industrialized – will be unable to manage multiple simultaneous systemic crises. Consequently, systemic collapse will likely result in widespread confusion, fear, human security risks, and social break down.
· This current transition of rapid economic decline was triggered by the oil price shock starting in 2007 and culminating in the summer of 2008. This transition will likely accelerate and become more volatile once oil prices exceed $80 – $90 per barrel for an extended time. Demand destruction for oil may be somewhere above $80 per barrel and below $141 per barrel.
· Economic recovery (i.e., business as usual) will likely exacerbate the global recession by driving up oil prices.
· A managed “de-growth” is impossible, because effective mitigation of peak oil will be dependent on the implementation of mega-projects and mega-changes at the maximum possible rate with at least 20 years lead time and trillions of dollars in investments.
· Peak oil and the events associated with it will be an unprecedented discontinuity in human and geologic history.
· Adaptation is the only strategy in response to peak oil.
· Mitigation and adaptation are the only strategies for climate change.
· Peak oil crises will soon confront societies with the opportunity to recreate themselves based on their respective needs, culture, resources, and governance responses.
· The impacts of peak oil and post-peak decline will not be the same equally for everyone everywhere at any given time.
· There are probably no solutions that do not involve at the very least some major changes in lifestyles.
· The localization of economies will likely occur on a massive scale, particularly the localization of the production of food, goods, and services.
· Existential crises will soon confront societies with the opportunity to recreate themselves based on their respective needs, culture, resources, and governance responses.
· If the international community does not make a transcendent effort to cooperate to manage the transition to a non-oil based economy, it may risk a volatile, chaotic, and dangerous collapse of the global economy and world population.
· Since the advent of the Green Revolution, the global human population has increased from 2.5 billion in 1950 to nearly 7 billion today.
· Global demand for natural resources exceeded planet’s capacity to provide sustainably for the combined demands of the global population between 1970 – 1980.
· The global population is projected to grow to around 9.2 billion by 2050.
· Current trends in land, soil, water, and biodiversity loss and degradation, combined with potential climate change impacts, ocean acidification, a mass extinction event, and energy scarcity will significantly limit the human carrying capacity of the Earth.
· Based on these estimates, the global population may have nearly reached or already exceeded the planet’s human carrying capacity in terms of food production.

I didn’t even have to read the full report carried out in California – the main points from John highlighted all I need to know. This report like every other report released lately all express the same view.
WE HAVE ALMOST DEPLETED ALL THE EARTH’S RESOURCES AND WE HAVE NO PLAN B.
I can not for the life of me understand why the goverments are not reacting quicker. (The looming climate & energy crisis makes the current fiscal crisis appear like a storm in a tea cup)
We need urgent action but unfortunately not enough people are aware of what is coming in 2, 5, 10 etc years time if we don’t adjust now.
Do governments take the issue seriously? or do they know and have prepared their own escape path and let the world’s population decrease with poverty, war, famine etc, because we need a clean slate to start again.
I don’t have the answers but I wish someone with credibility would stand up in the public domain and at least start a debate and let people choose the blue pill or the red pill.
It is kinda too late for governments to act, or even seriously discuss this problem and the ramifications. Why? Because we are so close to the edge now – so close to complete collapse – that any serious discussion of the consequences by any major governmental leader might just push us off the cliff immediately. Are you ready for complete collapse? I know I’m not; I’ve got plenty left to do to get ready. Yes, perhaps our species would be better off if the collapse happens sooner rather than later – but *I* wouldn’t, so I’m not going to complain that nobody’s talking about it much.
There’s really not a lot to say anyway. There is no avoiding this problem. Once the fossil fuels dry up food prices will spike and we will not be able to produce *nearly* enough food for as many people as currently exist. Not even close. Sooo…a good five or six billion of us are destined to die miserably and there’s nothing any government can do to prevent that at this point.
One thing I am grateful for: I had no children, by choice, so I need not fret that 80% or so of all children alive today or born in the near-future are going to die young. Every time I see a young child now, I cringe, knowing that their odds of ever reaching my age (46) are quite dismal.
Your view is very sobering indeed Jon and I think you’re probably right. The world can not sustain the amount of people living on it but my god it is so frightening to imagine the livng senario of no food/warm shelter and the fact that most people have no idea how to grow food.
However I don’t think its healthy in any way to think like this for long periods otherwise one might as well just died and get it over with.
I’m trying to prepare as best I can but I’m not sure if we’ll ever be ready. I suppose you’re right – it’s best that there isn’t a fuss made otherwise panic could sink the ship earlier. I actually want to have kids and believe that there is some future ahead for them but then again the next 5 years or less could be truely devastating and thats no place for kids.
I still live in hope though and the world still is a wonderful place – long may that remain.